MID Dm Sword + LongBow/Crossbow
Posted: Sat Oct 09, 2010 5:55 pm
Basic mid dm civ for no rules/ no R/S
Empire Earth and Empire Earth: The Art of Conquest Online Community. Get support for NeoEE multiplayer, discuss strategies, civilizations, and more!
http://www.save-ee.com/
no i did mean ca range or attack, and it wasnt intended for ca, it was intended for persians, as cata are ur biggest problem, u only build things u have the most points in? well i can c no use in that at all, basicly choose a civ, hope for the best, there is no skill in that. ur civ doesnt have btd if ur massing swords u kinda need it even in dm since half ur civ is based on wood and gold, u would want to be conserving it for your army instead of 10 extra rax's.
That's the most ignorant comment i've ever heard. lacrimosa, if you wanna comment and reinforce tacos statement, do it when you actually got evidence on his "so called skills".don't even start arguing with taco, ak_47. His superior mid skills own every argument.
That's no relevant argument and just shows what a... anyway hf.however i would argue my middle experience is far greater then yours
lacri what did you mean with that comment ?don't even start arguing with taco, ak_47. His superior mid skills own every argument.
And if my version of your comment is correct then Saying that his midd skills is better then mine, is not judging ?. seriously you contradict yourself lacri btw, taco how can your experience be better then mine when you dont even play mid dm... i do. i even played mid sh, and dont tell me you "own" me in it. since i've seen you play and i've played against you like 214327584933498529347 times... and still counting.That's no relevant argument and just shows what a... anyway hf.
And ak_47, my comment wasn't aimed at u, since I never played mid dm and therefore aren't in the position to judge in that case.
I was refering to the whole mid dm strategy thing...oh so saying that his midd skills is better then mine, is not judging