Save Empire Earth

For me personaly there was to much pre and to much gren in the lobby. I had some thoughts on a new set. Basically i wanted to avoid Liga starting in the ages pre-imp. Thatswhy i put the settings, on imp to nano ( imp 4 nano ). So bascially it stays in tl with 5 cits.But to avoid making it a imp tl unticked the custom civs. And to avoid making it liga i ticked the reaval map. So you will bascially playing a liga with reaval map starting in imp.

This set is quite hard to play, too, i wanted a new sheme in the set , that it is close to liga doesnt matter because the reaval map will change the starts more to an regular tl. I think this set is really nice, i tried it yesterday several times and it is just working amazingly. I will host some during the next weeks and watch how it goes, i would be glade if you wanna play some too.
I called it i4n because i did not want to call it i2n to not copy the pre name to close. And i didnt want to choose a random name , because noone would understand the titel and know wat i mean , in the lobby.

Settings :

- Imp to nano
- 5 cits , tl
- Tournament
- Map : Plains
- Countries as civs
- Reaval map

Basically the important things.

i like people trying to create new setts but its extremelly hard as people are too stubborn to play them.. gud luck to u but personally that sett wudnt befor me as im not a fan of imperial in liga to begin with. also the problem u have choosing no custom civs is that there is only really 3 civs anyone wud pick. austria, spain and assyrian(if ur noob)

I smell a Halb rush.

you could also use mod civs , and try to defend and age fast... it would work quite well i guess, i tried it and it did work out to be good enough.

Everyone would just do no settle halb rushes with Austria because the reveal map will allow you to see where your iron mine and hippos are.

citrush would work fine too unless ur no sett halb rushed

eww mixed it up with ren ^_^ DUnno if citrush works in imp but in ren its amazing

There at least is some people willing to play it, and i even know people who really like it , so just try it...

it sucks... i played you
i no settle rushed and beat you and your teammate......? idk.....
no settle rushing is just to easylol

So ? I played against many people in it , and lost some, doesnt mean the whole set sucks , your point is just trying to kick my nervs.
If you say i4n sucks than you say indy tl sucks either , you can easily rush people with no settel, and sometimes it works out well. You can do this really good in ind tl, too. JUst the point is when i have a nice spot with a nice tower covering a lot, your no settel start will just fail. SO whats your point ? Beating me with a no settel start means that the set sucks ? Pathetic...

uIwehFx wrote:So ? I played against many people in it , and lost some, doesnt mean the whole set sucks , your point is just trying to kick my nervs.
If you say i4n sucks than you say indy tl sucks either , you can easily rush people with no settel, and sometimes it works out well. You can do this really good in ind tl, too. JUst the point is when i have a nice spot with a nice tower covering a lot, your no settel start will just fail. SO whats your point ? Beating me with a no settel start means that the set sucks ? Pathetic...

i was kinda implying that this set will be based around no settle rushing..
indy tl is fine.. because the CR for building really works in the favour of the 1 settle player more then the no settle, its still hard ,but its defeinatly still effective....
industrial would elimnate spear rushers
and would improve the boom parto f the setting
but really you cant imply this complete nonsense
there completely differetn
"If you say i4n sucks than you say indy tl sucks either"
imperials such a drag of an age.. lol,

do you age in indy tl?
do spears 2 hit kill cits?
you have custom civs?

devilridermax wrote:

uIwehFx wrote:So ? I played against many people in it , and lost some, doesnt mean the whole set sucks , your point is just trying to kick my nervs.
If you say i4n sucks than you say indy tl sucks either , you can easily rush people with no settel, and sometimes it works out well. You can do this really good in ind tl, too. JUst the point is when i have a nice spot with a nice tower covering a lot, your no settel start will just fail. SO whats your point ? Beating me with a no settel start means that the set sucks ? Pathetic...

i was kinda implying that this set will be based around no settle rushing..
indy tl is fine.. because the CR for building really works in the favour of the 1 settle player more then the no settle, its still hard ,but its defeinatly still effective....
industrial would elimnate spear rushers
and would improve the boom parto f the setting
but really you cant imply this complete nonsense
there completely differetn
"If you say i4n sucks than you say indy tl sucks either"
imperials such a drag of an age.. lol,

do you age in indy tl?
do spears 2 hit kill cits?
you have custom civs?

Your points are just rediculous. It will be easier to defend a no settel rush in i4n than in indy , obviously. Without settel you will have a massiv resource probelem after your 2nd unit in i4n, in indy tl you have the right civs to be able to. No civ is giving you opertunity for fast gold + fast food. Also your units will never be perfect for rushing , lack of range , lack of attack to kill cits fast... this is all points that it make it harder in i4n to no settel rush than in indy tl.
Really that you won vs me with no settel rush was probably because i did a 2 settel rush without any possibility to rush. Or my spot was just horrible.
And i can just say that the rush in imp will be quite similar to the rush in indy

it would just take coulpe liga players to join your game and show you how easy it is to rush in imp, after all they play that age quite a bit as it is and know the civ/strat to use for that epoc

imperial isnt very good. tha cav suck and the spear rushes own quite simply..

I play liga my self , so i knew imp and the start + civs before.

But i am not sure what you both mean ?! I mean is it bad playing a age where you can rush, or were cav is bad ? I mean it doesnt matter really , you age with 180 and 180 of gold/iron and 365 food i think. So the ageing occurs around f11 12-15 depense on how the game is going. And in indy , cav is quite strong, so things turn around.

I really dont want to start arguing in this topic as well. If you think it is worth playing it , play it , if not just leave it. The set is just the set now

but a rush is usually around 4-5 f11 so if the other guy is just booming hes most likely dead