Oldschool vs Newschool

Talk about anything EE related and doesn't belong in another forum. Gameplay, chit-chat, or any questions you have -- it all belongs here.
Post Reply
[-Ts-] Tricky
Administrator
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by [-Ts-] Tricky »

not really nemo 2 rax start didnt last very long at all when ever i used to play it everyone was making 3 rax start and that was near start of grens creation
Image
-NeW-: ey idiot
-NeW-: triki
-NeW-: no
-NeW-: stupid
-NeW-: u are syndrom down
-NeW-: and retardet
simple_faith Assassin was pretty great
Kazter:Assassin was shit.

Captain Nemo
Global Moderator
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Captain Nemo »

I ment with the "nothing has improved" part. Thats untrue as it has improved ALOT since the beginning
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."

SlipKnoT
Nemesis
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:50 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by SlipKnoT »

Tricky... Pearly = Viper u dimbass..

Here here to the death of grenwar
Image
Image

[-Ts-] Tricky
Administrator
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by [-Ts-] Tricky »

pearly dont = viper you noob lol viper and pearly was different players
Image
-NeW-: ey idiot
-NeW-: triki
-NeW-: no
-NeW-: stupid
-NeW-: u are syndrom down
-NeW-: and retardet
simple_faith Assassin was pretty great
Kazter:Assassin was shit.

User avatar
lightnessking.
Nemesis
Posts: 2050
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by lightnessking. »

dang. retard 1 tries to own in a discussion with retard 2. And retard 2 wins. Well done tricky! ^^
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.

SlipKnoT
Nemesis
Posts: 660
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:50 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by SlipKnoT »

viper changed his name to pearly. this is 100%. tricky u are still dumb
Image
Image

_thor
Full Member
Posts: 107
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2011 7:17 am
Lobby Username: pM_Thor

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by _thor »

booming is always the superior methodology of winning. ofc i'm biased, please take my comment with a grain of salt

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by _thor on Wed Sep 04, 2013 8:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
pM - Legacy
Image
{Sauerkraut>}I love you: boom or rush this is the uesatinoin , i love shakespearei

User avatar
Omega
Administrator
Posts: 1807
Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 3:56 pm
Lobby Username: [-Ts-] Ωmega
Location: Washington, DC / USA
Contact:

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Omega »

The only superior methodology is outplaying your opponent.

Sometimes, that is accomplished by outbooming your opponent. Other times, not.
Image

[-Ts-] Tricky
Administrator
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:31 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by [-Ts-] Tricky »

viper changed his name to pearly. this is 100%. tricky u are still dumb

no he didnt pearly was much better play than viper in liga setts and other setts 100% sure ;p
Image
-NeW-: ey idiot
-NeW-: triki
-NeW-: no
-NeW-: stupid
-NeW-: u are syndrom down
-NeW-: and retardet
simple_faith Assassin was pretty great
Kazter:Assassin was shit.

User avatar
Arntzen
Administrator
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:13 am
Lobby Username: _[eC]_Arntzen_
Location: Norway

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Arntzen »

I keep coming back to this topic hoping you guys have actually talked about what this was really about. tricky and slip can spam the shout out box on ts site or something.

I've always looked at booming (overbooming) as lazy. I used to call it Pope Of Dope-style, but I guess it's more of a Wolvy-phenomenon where both of them knew they were a head, and sat idle in their base booming big to make them feel superior.

I've always thought winning the game asap was the best way to go. When both players (or both teams) think like this, that's when I've had the best games.

Not saying I can't enjoy a large map 4v4 mid where I wall myself as pocket and go knights, just saying it's not what I enjoy the most.
A Good Place to Start: viewtopic.php?f=75&t=3884
Click to download: eC Civilization

Captain Nemo
Global Moderator
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Captain Nemo »

Sure it's the best way to win in teamgames, provided u actually do win it. But most fun? Not agreeing there. I deliberately avoid fast winning strats in mod sh (zooks, speed marines etc) and mod dm most of the time simply because it's more fun with longer games imo.
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."

User avatar
lightnessking.
Nemesis
Posts: 2050
Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by lightnessking. »

Captain Nemo wrote:Sure it's the best way to win in teamgames, provided u actually do win it. But most fun? Not agreeing there. I deliberately avoid fast winning strats in mod sh (zooks, speed marines etc) and mod dm most of the time simply because it's more fun with longer games imo.
I think he's more like speaking about let's say a mid sh, where both players are base sitting for f11 30 not attacking each other, expanding and booming and eventually perform an one-time-win-or-loss attack.
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.

Captain Nemo
Global Moderator
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Captain Nemo »

No he's talking about pope or wolvy knowing that they can indeed kill their opponent now if they just attacked but they want to keep booming so they look even better when they finally decide to make the kill.
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."

User avatar
Arntzen
Administrator
Posts: 1983
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:13 am
Lobby Username: _[eC]_Arntzen_
Location: Norway

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Arntzen »

Captain Nemo wrote:Sure it's the best way to win in teamgames, provided u actually do win it. But most fun? Not agreeing there. I deliberately avoid fast winning strats in mod sh (zooks, speed marines etc) and mod dm most of the time simply because it's more fun with longer games imo.
I did not mean all-in cheesy tactics. I ment, if I go sword on wing, I'll rush and try to hurt my opponent as much as possible. If I go tanks in mod sh, and scout a weakness, I'll try to abuse that to win (aka a guy having 3farms before second tank factory, I'll attack quick, or do hero push etc).

These IMO are the most interesting games, cause you know all are on their toes actually trying their best. As oppose to games were (doing a stereo type here) eisregen does what lightnessking is talking about.

Longer games are just fun if it actually goes to late game BECAUSE it's pretty equal. If it's not equal and it goes to late game, it's just getting more and more one sided. Again, in my experience.
A Good Place to Start: viewtopic.php?f=75&t=3884
Click to download: eC Civilization

Captain Nemo
Global Moderator
Posts: 1101
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 11:23 am
Lobby Username: >Heros<=Captain Nemo*

Re: Oldschool vs Newschool

Post by Captain Nemo »

In that case I COMPLETELY agree :)

Although I've often let my wings live in mod dm... because I had to if I wanted a gg vs alot of excellent opponents who just didn't properly know early game and thus excelled more in late game because of their early game weakness.
bosshaft: "A warm pussy is so much better than a dick! Trust me."

Post Reply

Return to “EE General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests