What part of the definition did I leave out that pertains to that sentence you wrote.
I tried not to respond, but making you look more stupid then you are is fun
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
This is just plain wrong. I many times did already explain why and wonder why people don't think about things like that a little more.IMO when it comes to respect (setting wise):
1. All set player
2. Liga expert
3. SH and TL player (PRE/Mid/Indy/Mod)
4. Mod DM player
5. SH or TL player (Pre/Mid/Indy/Mod)
6. Mod Sh player
7. Middle player
8. Pre player
9. Mid sh f11 60 No R/S/B/D/G/F/Q/E/T/D/G/H/H/D
10. Fuckings grenwar players.
Approx when was this? What year?_DavE_ wrote:Bin my day
I don't know if you're talking team or 1vs1 here, but IMO the problem with CA EXP in 1vs1 is it's weakness to Sword EXP, where as regular CA owns that._DavE_ wrote:Ps Seizmic's cav exp without btd would destroy your regular EE civs. I went 74-0 1v1 using that civ against many of the players I just named.
Just reading some of these names gave me a stiffy_DavE_ wrote:Bump - just read this lol. Once I learned how to boom/get early hero without using expansionism, I used the normal EE civ/start on wing towards the end of my aoc days and never had an issue taking out exp players. I wasn't that good when the likes of buttfreek and ice storm were in their primes.
The expert players in my day when I finally got good after Seizmic taught me were:
Calv
Ice storm
Elite
Signal
Dawn
Dusk
Reaux
Yankee
Answer
Pyro
Dante
General Jade
I'm not saying I won every game but I'd rarely lose on wing in mid 4v4s.
Ps Seizmic's cav exp without btd would destroy your regular EE civs. I went 74-0 1v1 using that civ against many of the players I just named.
Texas' playing style was unorthodox but effective, however I remember winning him 3-0 and then he refused to play me.
Well, in retrospect "owning" is definitely an overstatement. What makes Mid AOC more interesting to me than EEC is that you in theory have 5 doable civs for 1vs1 (Sword, Sword EXP, CA, CA EXP, Knight EXP). Sword vs Sword EXP is very well balanced and I have an hard time seeing which is favorite. CA vs Sword as we saw this summer also isn't clear. Sword vs CA EXP imo definitely favors swords. Sword EXP vs CA slightly favors CA, and Sword EXP vs CA EXP slightly favors Sword EXP. The reason why regular CA is better vs Sword EXP is because regular CA can put much more pressure on early on (WC+Gold Mining). Whats absolutely clear in my mind in Mid AOC is that the last thing you want is Sword EXP to boom, because late game it's a clear favorite to beat all the other civilizations._DavE_ wrote: Going off what you just said about regular cav civ owning swd exp... this cav exp civ would also destroy swd exp (in theory) because you can mass cavs much quicker with exp, than without.
Even if this was true, which I would contest, part of what made AoC so much better than EEC for me was more than just the high skill level. There was so much personality, rivalry, and bromancing. It was almost like being a cast member on one of those dumb reality shows like Jersey Shore. Part of me wants to sit in a 4v4 lobby for an hour aimlessly waiting for someone to finally assign captains, realizing there was actually a video game to be played. I don't get that same vibe from EEC, which to me is a bit stale and boring. Most people I see on EEC take the game a little too seriously.Arntzen wrote:PS. Never forget: Top 4 Mid EEC players would wipe the floor against top 4 Mid AOC players in both games.
Let's talk about currently...who the top eec players would be?Arntzen wrote: PS. Never forget: Top 4 Mid EEC players would wipe the floor against top 4 Mid AOC players in both games.
This is the one I would disagree with 100%. Back in my time, I didn't lose Cav Exp vs Regular Swords, You'll be surprised by how much pressure you can put on, and how fast you can mass cavs with exp. You would start building a 3rd archery at 5 f11. Of course, this is going back years to my time.Swords vs CA Exp, Imo definitely favours swords
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 70 guests