Save Empire Earth

AEnima wrote:Finally someone who understands. You can't just pick one unit that can counter it and totally throw out the argument, we're talking about an overall game here.

Yes we were talking about cataphracts were too strong (according to you) and I'm trying to change your mind that they are not. Tho obviously your ignorance overrules my comments.

There's literally no way you can read.

AEnima wrote:There's literally no way you can read.

Goes for you as well.

swords > Ca....

my point is how u use them. Nevermind, you dont understand my point.

I've whispered you my points, you can make your own decisions.

You can't use rationale with him, it's really pointless. 5 pages later we're stuck on "persians beat them"

AEnima wrote:You can't use rationale with him, it's really pointless. 5 pages later we're stuck on "persians beat them"

No we're not stuck on that part.

Obviously you didn't got the point.

AND

There's literally no way you can read.

Man stop putting words in peoples mouth!! -.- lol

I repeat, le sigh.

BC wud you really get catas in a dark-dark game? We're not talking about liga so get the "pocket goes ca" out of your head. I for one have played maybe 15 dark-dark sh games on GR, I made pers everyone and guess what! Eventually everyone made persians then into bronze bali. Then they realized how unbalanced this age is and went back to playing middle.


As both me and light have said already: catas are good in liga so no point argueing about this.

I never played dark sh but making persians in dark dm was suicide. Perhaps sh would be different in some cases though.

dark dm used to be bronze cannons + barbs and zues if i remember right

Bronze cannons? You mean stone throwers right?

bronze cannons lol from seige factorys LOL not inf cannons lol

ehm trix they talk about dark age not indy

trix.. rock throwers are inf, stone throwers the balistas of the dark age.