Cataphracts buffed too much
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 1107
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2009 6:31 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
wow fags i thought you was on about eec dont need cry about lol at the start of the topic it didnt even say it was about aoc
-NeW-: ey idiot
-NeW-: triki
-NeW-: no
-NeW-: stupid
-NeW-: u are syndrom down
-NeW-: and retardet
simple_faith Assassin was pretty great
Kazter:Assassin was shit.
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:24 pm
- Lobby Username: AEnema
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Someone please close this topic. Lightnessking and Kazter are debating that persians beat cataphracts, as if anyone was disputing that. Not even talking about Dark Age as a whole. Kind of hilarious.
- lightnessking.
- Nemesis
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
mABeeey we shud decrease persian defencuhh by 71% and its attakck by uhhh 37%! since cataparactarahs are so buffpowerfull buffalos and perses beat dem buffalos !!!!!!AEnima wrote:Someone please close this topic. Lightnessking and Kazter are debating that persians beat cataphracts, as if anyone was disputing that. Not even talking about Dark Age as a whole. Kind of hilarious.
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.
- Arntzen
- Administrator
- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 4:13 am
- Lobby Username: _[eC]_Arntzen_
- Location: Norway
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
What we are trying to make u understand is that DARK AGE IS UNBALANCED AS *@$&!!!
Reason for this is that persians are so superior to everything else in this age. U can compare it to marines in ww2 or aa's in digi, but those two examples aren't even close to how OP persians is in dark age.
Reason for this is that persians are so superior to everything else in this age. U can compare it to marines in ww2 or aa's in digi, but those two examples aren't even close to how OP persians is in dark age.
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:24 pm
- Lobby Username: AEnema
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
No, I was saying that Cataphracts are extremely awesome in Dark Age and pretty much roll almost every unit (based of the % of units it beats, its probably one of the best compared to other ages) and you turned it into...Persians beat them, as if anyone didn't know that.
- lightnessking.
- Nemesis
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Phalanx, persian, bronze cavalry kill the cataphract.AEnima wrote:No, I was saying that Cataphracts are extremely awesome in Dark Age and pretty much roll almost every unit (based of the % of units it beats, its probably one of the best compared to other ages) and you turned it into...Persians beat them, as if anyone didn't know that.
And if you compare multiple cataphracts vs units, then you can also add war elephants into that list. (not sure if war elephants will win solo, but in multiple units they certainly will.)
4 units which kills cataphracts in dark age.
1 unit which is equal to cataphracts (which are obviously cataphracts herpaderpalerp.)
now let's take a war elephant in dark ages. What units kills war elephants?
comp bow
charioteer
elephant archers.
3 units?
Does that means war elephants are too big of a buffalo ?? We definately need a new patch since they're overpowered omgawd.
As I'm free from work atm, I will edit this post at home !
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:24 pm
- Lobby Username: AEnema
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Ok, Cataphracts beat War Elepahants, in terms of what it costs to make each...
Anyways, literally every one of Lightness' posts are filled with
But the point of this wasn't to whine about needing a patch etc. (Refer to the past where I told you that you have a problem of putting worts in people's mouths) It was simply to throw the idea out there and have a discussion about it. But that is clearly not possible on these forums.
Anyways, literally every one of Lightness' posts are filled with
Does that means war elephants are too big of a buffalo ?? We definately need a new patch since they're overpowered omgawd.
HERPADERPALERP HE CUD MAKE SUM BRONZE KNIGHTZORZ BRO
mABeeey we shud decrease persian defencuhh by 71% and its attakck by uhhh 37%! since cataparactarahs are so buffpowerfull buffalos and perses beat dem buffalos !!!!!!
Obviously incapable of having an adult conversation, lovely moderator.which are obviously cataphracts herpaderpalerp
But the point of this wasn't to whine about needing a patch etc. (Refer to the past where I told you that you have a problem of putting worts in people's mouths) It was simply to throw the idea out there and have a discussion about it. But that is clearly not possible on these forums.
- lightnessking.
- Nemesis
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
umad bro? I will have an adult conversation when ever i want aslong they are worth it, and if the person im talking too deserves being threated as an adult. you sir, unfortunately didnt meet the requirements.AEnima wrote:Ok, Cataphracts beat War Elepahants, in terms of what it costs to make each...
Anyways, literally every one of Lightness' posts are filled withDoes that means war elephants are too big of a buffalo ?? We definately need a new patch since they're overpowered omgawd.HERPADERPALERP HE CUD MAKE SUM BRONZE KNIGHTZORZ BROmABeeey we shud decrease persian defencuhh by 71% and its attakck by uhhh 37%! since cataparactarahs are so buffpowerfull buffalos and perses beat dem buffalos !!!!!!Obviously incapable of having an adult conversation, lovely moderator.which are obviously cataphracts herpaderpalerp
But the point of this wasn't to whine about needing a patch etc. (Refer to the past where I told you that you have a problem of putting worts in people's mouths) It was simply to throw the idea out there and have a discussion about it. But that is clearly not possible on these forums.
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:25 pm
- Lobby Username: DrHouseMd
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Sorry guys, calv is right. Cataphrats are very good in dark age, mainly because CA suck so bad. And they do fine against persians. Just gotta micro a bit. Elephant archers are very good, no idea what that was brought up lol.
- lightnessking.
- Nemesis
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Persians > Cataphracts. They do not do fine against persians...DrHouseMd wrote:Sorry guys, calv is right. Cataphrats are very good in dark age, mainly because CA suck so bad. And they do fine against persians. Just gotta micro a bit. Elephant archers are very good, no idea what that was brought up lol.
And for "Just gotta micro a bit." that's the same vice versa.
Since persians are countering cata's, are just as fast as cata's and are ranged units (you can run the front row to the back while the last row are firing their javelins. If done right you take minimum damage from cataphracts even if the cataphract player makes use of micro.) they're stronger then cataphracts.
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:25 pm
- Lobby Username: DrHouseMd
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
My argument is based on overwell usefullness in the game. How many dark games have you actually played bro? Catas can hold thier own against persians and utterly own pockets. There the swords of dark.
-
- Intermediate Member
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 8:24 pm
- Lobby Username: AEnema
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Finally someone who understands. You can't just pick one unit that can counter it and totally throw out the argument, we're talking about an overall game here.
-
- Banned
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 6:25 pm
- Lobby Username: DrHouseMd
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
According to you lights arguement, swords should be used in every mid game, every map position because swords > CA....its an logical fallacy.
- lightnessking.
- Nemesis
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
You don't have to play any dark age games to conclude a dark age unit (which exists in middle ages) owns another dark age units (which surprisingly, also exists in middle ages.)DrHouseMd wrote:My argument is based on overwell usefullness in the game. How many dark games have you actually played bro? Catas can hold thier own against persians and utterly own pockets. There the swords of dark.
I compared persians to cataphracts, not on how they're used in a liga/dark age game, but as how they're used in general. As in liga cataphracts DO own pockets (if they go charioteers which is most likely yes.) but I still think perses wing / charioteer pocket is the best way of playing (assuming all players are equal strength.)
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.
- lightnessking.
- Nemesis
- Posts: 2050
- Joined: Fri Nov 27, 2009 9:27 pm
Re: Cataphracts buffed too much
Swords < Cav because of the speed you can outrun the swords.DrHouseMd wrote:According to you lights arguement, swords should be used in every mid game, every map position because swords > CA....its an logical fallacy.
You cannot make another post so soon after your last.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests