Oldschool vs Newschool

[herik]

Reason why I said 90% not 100% you're a waste of time to talk to kaz, you've always got something to bitch about

[Captain Nemo]

u said 90% of the newschool pros use the old strats not that people used 90% of the strats made up back then.

But other than that what does it really take to concider something a "new" strat? Cause if you're talking inf on wing and cav in pocket in say indy, Im not so very impressed that they came up with that. Also, doesn't say anything about the skill level of oldschoolers compared to newschoolers.

[lightnessking.]

sigh can herik get banned from the forum please. It's okay to have retards in this topic to discuss shit, but he exceeds the limits by far...

[herik]

u said 90% of the newschool pros use the old strats not that people used 90% of the strats made up back then.

But other than that what does it really take to concider something a "new" strat? Cause if you're talking inf on wing and cav in pocket in say indy, Im not so very impressed that they came up with that. Also, doesn't say anything about the skill level of oldschoolers compared to newschoolers.

Nemo what hasn't a old schooler tried that a new schooler has?

[lightnessking.]

u said 90% of the newschool pros use the old strats not that people used 90% of the strats made up back then.

But other than that what does it really take to concider something a "new" strat? Cause if you're talking inf on wing and cav in pocket in say indy, Im not so very impressed that they came up with that. Also, doesn't say anything about the skill level of oldschoolers compared to newschoolers.

Nemo what hasn't a old schooler tried that a new schooler has?

pre-sl-1cit-citrush

[lightnessking.]

And I can already hear you thinking out loud "HOW IS 1 CIT GOING TO BEAT AN ENEMY".
Well the key is not to attack with 1 cit but save until you have more.

Bye herik

[Captain Nemo]

u said 90% of the newschool pros use the old strats not that people used 90% of the strats made up back then.

But other than that what does it really take to concider something a "new" strat? Cause if you're talking inf on wing and cav in pocket in say indy, Im not so very impressed that they came up with that. Also, doesn't say anything about the skill level of oldschoolers compared to newschoolers.

Nemo what hasn't a old schooler tried that a new schooler has?

What is concidered a "new strat" to u? Also, it's not just trying something it's doing it with succes. But Im sure Im not the best person to ask about this.

[Black Star]

Omfg Herik you completely saying NOTHING

[ConquerorX]

Lol @ this whole threat =]

[simple_faith]

hi jeremy

[Arntzen]

Lol @ this whole threat =]

I think you can contribute a little bit more to this threat than this.

[bosshaft]

10 pages about cocksucking
congrats u losers

[lightnessking.]

10 pages about cocksucking
congrats u losers

Biggest cocksucker notifies us that these pages are about cock suckers.

[ConquerorX]

hi jeremy

hey man! How goes it?

Also- I didn't write that post "Lol at this whole threat., I have no recollection of writing that. Why would I? Also its a thread. And of course I can attribute more Art. Allot better wise ass comments then that :O

[ConquerorX]

This old school vs new school nonsense . IMO it doesn't matter when you played or started. Its like learning anything. People who learned along time ago can be good or bad and people who learn more recently can be good or bad. As long as you practice allot you get better and stop practicing you get worse etc.