What part of the definition did I leave out that pertains to that sentence you wrote.
I tried not to respond, but making you look more stupid then you are is fun

IMO when it comes to respect (setting wise):
1. All set player
2. Liga expert
3. SH and TL player (PRE/Mid/Indy/Mod)
4. Mod DM player
5. SH or TL player (Pre/Mid/Indy/Mod)
6. Mod Sh player
7. Middle player
8. Pre player
9. Mid sh f11 60 No R/S/B/D/G/F/Q/E/T/D/G/H/H/D
10. Fuckings grenwar players.
_DavE_ wrote:Bin my day
_DavE_ wrote:Ps Seizmic's cav exp without btd would destroy your regular EE civs. I went 74-0 1v1 using that civ against many of the players I just named.
_DavE_ wrote:Bump - just read this lol. Once I learned how to boom/get early hero without using expansionism, I used the normal EE civ/start on wing towards the end of my aoc days and never had an issue taking out exp players. I wasn't that good when the likes of buttfreek and ice storm were in their primes.
The expert players in my day when I finally got good after Seizmic taught me were:
Calv
Ice storm
Elite
Signal
Dawn
Dusk
Reaux
Yankee
Answer
Pyro
Dante
General Jade
I'm not saying I won every game but I'd rarely lose on wing in mid 4v4s.
Ps Seizmic's cav exp without btd would destroy your regular EE civs. I went 74-0 1v1 using that civ against many of the players I just named.
Texas' playing style was unorthodox but effective, however I remember winning him 3-0 and then he refused to play me.
_DavE_ wrote:Going off what you just said about regular cav civ owning swd exp... this cav exp civ would also destroy swd exp (in theory) because you can mass cavs much quicker with exp, than without.
Arntzen wrote:PS. Never forget: Top 4 Mid EEC players would wipe the floor against top 4 Mid AOC players in both games.
Arntzen wrote:PS. Never forget: Top 4 Mid EEC players would wipe the floor against top 4 Mid AOC players in both games.
Swords vs CA Exp, Imo definitely favours swords
Return to EE General Discussion
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests